The Journal of Modern Craft

199 papers and 337 indexed citations i.

About

The 199 papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft in the last decades have received a total of 337 indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft usually cover Museology (124 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (56 papers) and Urban Studies (49 papers) specifically the topics of Crafts, Textile, and Design (112 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (74 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Modern Craft are Julia Bryan-Wilson, Otto von Busch, Thomas S.J. Smith, Ulrich Lehmann, Kevin Murray, Stephen Knott, Leonardo Bonanni, Yūko Kikuchi, John Roberts and Janis K. Jefferies.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Modern Craft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Modern Craft. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Modern Craft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Modern Craft more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025