˜The œcryosphere

3.0k papers and 91.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.0k papers published in ˜The œcryosphere in the last decades have received a total of 91.6k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œcryosphere usually cover Atmospheric Science (3.0k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (695 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (566 papers) specifically the topics of Cryospheric studies and observations (2.7k papers), Climate change and permafrost (1.6k papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œcryosphere are Matthias Huss, Andreas Kääb, Xavier Fettweis, M. R. van den Broeke, Stephan Gruber, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, D. J. Cavalieri, Claire L. Parkinson, Christopher Nuth and Ian M. Howat.

In The Last Decade

˜The œcryosphere

2.8k papers receiving 88.9k citations

Fields of papers published in ˜The œcryosphere

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œcryosphere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œcryosphere.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œcryosphere

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œcryosphere. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œcryosphere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œcryosphere more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026