Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany)

391 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 391 papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (288 papers), Molecular Biology (275 papers) and Plant Science (134 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (265 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (218 papers) and Plant and animal studies (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) are Kai Larsen, Pranom Chantaranothai, David J. Middleton, Kitichate Sridith, Puangpen Sirirugsa, Kongkanda Chayamarit, Somran Suddee, W.J.J.O. de Wilde, Sahut Chantanaorrapint and B.E.E. Duyfjes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany).

Countries where authors publish in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025