Techniques Sciences Méthodes

316 papers and 511 indexed citations i.

About

The 316 papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes in the last decades have received a total of 511 indexed citations. Papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes usually cover Water Science and Technology (71 papers), Sociology and Political Science (64 papers) and Environmental Engineering (46 papers) specifically the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (46 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (28 papers) and Urban Stormwater Management Solutions (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Techniques Sciences Méthodes are Marina Coquery, J.M. Choubert, G. Chebbo, Abderrazak Bouanani, Cécile Miège, Hélène Budzinski, M. Esperanza, Vincent Rocher, Nadia Boutaleb and Olivier Sire.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes.

Countries where authors publish in Techniques Sciences Méthodes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Techniques Sciences Méthodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Techniques Sciences Méthodes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025