ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

2.6k citations
201 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

178 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.5k
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.0k
  • Computer Science Applications 170
  • Marketing 254
  • Computer Networks and Communications 567
Replace Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning with:
Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning United States
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems United States
Journal of Management Analytics China
Big Data Research China
Handbooks in operations research and management science United States
Operations Research Perspectives United States
Progress in Artificial Intelligence Spain
Synthesis lectures on human language technologies United States
Policy & Internet United States
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting United States
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation relative to Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning United States Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation.

About ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

The 201 papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (173 papers), Marketing (44 papers), Economics and Econometrics (103 papers), Computer Science Applications (18 papers) and General Decision Sciences (5 papers) specifically the topics of Auction Theory and Applications (132 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (79 papers), Game Theory and Applications (76 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (43 papers), Economic theories and models (27 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (27 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (21 papers) and Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation are Ariel D. Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, Moshe Tennenholtz, Tim Roughgarden, Assaf Schuster, Dan Tsafrir, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda, Muli Ben-Yehuda, Asuman Ozdaglar and Amin Saberi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact