Surgical Neurology International

4.2k papers and 29.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Surgical Neurology International in the last decades have received a total of 29.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical Neurology International usually cover Neurology (1.8k papers), Surgery (1.7k papers) and Epidemiology (868 papers) specifically the topics of Meningioma and schwannoma management (630 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (615 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (551 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical Neurology International are NancyE Epstein, Nancy E. Epstein, Joseph C. Maroon, Russell L. Blaylock, Rajanandini Muralidharan, Mark M. Stecker, Pieter Kubben, Émilie Le Rhun, Sophie Taillibert and Sergio Canavero.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical Neurology International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical Neurology International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical Neurology International.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical Neurology International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical Neurology International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical Neurology International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical Neurology International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025