Countries where authors publish in Sub-cellular biochemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sub-cellular biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sub-cellular biochemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry.
About Sub-cellular biochemistry
The 1.4k papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Sub-cellular biochemistry usually cover Aging (33 papers), Cell Biology (228 papers), Molecular Biology (897 papers), Biochemistry (78 papers) and Biochemistry (53 papers) specifically the topics of Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (104 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (80 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (71 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (68 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (62 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (61 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (59 papers) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sub-cellular biochemistry are K. D. Rainsford, Rustem I. Litvinov, John W. Weisel, Véronique Cabiaux, Erik Goormaghtigh, Jean‐Marie Ruysschaert, J. Robin Harris, Pradeep Kumar Sacitharan, Peter J. Quinn and Xiaoyuan Wang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.