Smith College Studies in Social Work

6.1k citations
798 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Social Work Education and Practice
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Papers in

    • Social Work Education and Practice 177
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 168
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 141
    • Child Abuse and Trauma 51
    • Migration, Health and Trauma 44
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 43

Smith College Studies in Social Work

644 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Smith College Studies in Social Work
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Public Administration 1.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.1k
  • Health 652
  • Social Psychology 1.5k
  • General Health Professions 1.7k
Replace Journal of Social Work Practice with:
Journal of Social Work Practice United Kingdom
Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work United States
Journal of Teaching in Social Work United States
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy Australia
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Canada
Children & Schools United States
American Journal of Education United States
Nursing Philosophy United Kingdom
Action Research United States
Journal of Feminist Family Therapy United States
Smith College Studies in Social Work relative to Journal of Social Work Practice United Kingdom Journal of Social Work Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Social Work Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Smith College Studies in Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Smith College Studies in Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Smith College Studies in Social Work more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work.

About Smith College Studies in Social Work

The 798 papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work usually cover Public Administration (177 papers), Clinical Psychology (421 papers), General Psychology (11 papers), Social Psychology (161 papers) and General Health Professions (152 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (177 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (168 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (141 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (66 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (65 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (51 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (44 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Smith College Studies in Social Work are Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, James W. Drisko, Joshua Miller, Carol Tosone, Joan Berzoff, R. Aubrey, Ruth Dean, Ann A. O’Connell, James Garbarino and Ga-Young Choi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact