Ruth Dean
Impact in
- Public Administration top 2%
- Social Work Education and Practice
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Family and Disability Support Research
Papers in
-
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 9
- Child Therapy and Development 2
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 2
-
- Social Work Education and Practice 7
- Co-authors
- Helen Z. Reinherz (1 shared paper)Stephanie P. Wladkowski (1 shared paper)Richard Krautheimer (1 shared paper)Bryce Lyon (1 shared paper)Gerhart B. Ladner (1 shared paper)Ernst Kitzinger (1 shared paper)Paul Oskar Kristeller (1 shared paper)Richard McKeon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Social Work Journal (5 papers)Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services (3 papers)Journal of Social Work Education (2 papers)Social Work (1 paper)Speculum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Dean
16 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Public Administration 214
- Clinical Psychology 197
- General Health Professions 159
- Social Psychology 119
- Health 22
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Dean. The network helps show where Ruth Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 143 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 44 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 0 |
About Ruth Dean
Ruth Dean is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Administration, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (9 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (214 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations) and Health (22 citations). Ruth Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Z. Reinherz, Stephanie P. Wladkowski, Richard Krautheimer, Bryce Lyon, Gerhart B. Ladner, Ernst Kitzinger, Paul Oskar Kristeller, Richard McKeon, Marshall Clagett and Ihor Ševčenko. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Social Work Journal, Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work and Speculum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.