Studies on Ethno-Medicine

494 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 494 papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (100 papers), Plant Science (69 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (48 papers) specifically the topics of Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (44 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (32 papers) and HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies on Ethno-Medicine are Mehmet Çetin, İlker Uğulu, Veena Bhasin, Sefa Akbulut, Analava Mitra, Turgut Karaköse, Karl Peltzer, Pozi Milow, Chandra Singh Negi and Xiaoming Yang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Studies on Ethno-Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies on Ethno-Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies on Ethno-Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025