Studies in philology

398 papers and 448 indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Studies in philology in the last decades have received a total of 448 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in philology usually cover Classics (166 papers), History (154 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (126 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (151 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (71 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in philology are Manish Sharma, Clifford Davidson, Tim William Machan, Tiffany Stern, Melissa E. Sanchez, Thomas D. Hill, Leonard Neidorf, Jamie C. Fumo, Joshua S. Smith and Hassan Melehy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in philology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in philology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in philology.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in philology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in philology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in philology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in philology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025