Thomas D. Hill
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 36
- Medieval Literature and History 34
- Byzantine Studies and History 4
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 3
-
- Linguistics and language evolution 17
- Co-authors
- Thomas N. Hall (3 shared papers)Charles D. Wright (4 shared papers)Jamie Dollahite (1 shared paper)Laura Thomas (1 shared paper)David R. Just (1 shared paper)Brian Wansink (1 shared paper)Lara Latimer (1 shared paper)Martin Camargo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Notes and Queries (12 papers)Speculum (4 papers)The Journal of English and Germanic Philology (4 papers)Traditio (4 papers)Neophilologus (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Thomas D. Hill
37 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Classics 114
- History 58
- Language and Linguistics 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 20
- Anthropology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Hill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Hill. The network helps show where Thomas D. Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 25 | |
| 2 | Via crucis : essays on early medieval sources and ideas : in memory of J.E. Cross | 2002 | 11 |
| 3 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 20 | The Genealogy of Galahad and the New Age of the World in the Old French Prose 'Queste del Saint Graal.' | 1994 | 2 |
About Thomas D. Hill
Thomas D. Hill is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 154 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (34 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (17 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (7 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (6 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (114 citations), History (58 citations), Language and Linguistics (43 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations) and Anthropology (12 citations). Thomas D. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Hall, Charles D. Wright, Jamie Dollahite, Laura Thomas, David R. Just, Brian Wansink, Lara Latimer, Martin Camargo and Paul E. Szarmach. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, Speculum, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, Traditio and Neophilologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.