Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

492 papers and 436 indexed citations i.

About

The 492 papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia in the last decades have received a total of 436 indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia usually cover Political Science and International Relations (363 papers), Law (243 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (80 papers) specifically the topics of Polish Law and Legal System (252 papers), Polish Legal and Social Issues (138 papers) and European and International Law Studies (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia are Mirosław Karpiuk, Raphael Cohen‐Almagor, Agnieszka Wojcieszak, John Marshall, Christopher Bovis, Konrad Szocik, Andrzej Marian Świątkowski, Jacek Sobczak, Csaba Molnár and Tomasz J Guzik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Iuridica Lublinensia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Iuridica Lublinensia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025