Review of Middle East Studies

191 papers and 374 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 191 papers published in Review of Middle East Studies in the last decades have received a total of 374 indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Middle East Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (103 papers), Political Science and International Relations (92 papers) and History (21 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (48 papers), Islamic Studies and History (45 papers) and Middle East Politics and Society (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Middle East Studies are James B. Hoesterey, Elliott Colla, Şebnem Gümüşçü, Berk Esen, Jessica Winegar, Allison Spencer Hartnett, Linda T. Darling, Michael E. Bonine, Saleem H. Ali and Paul A. Silverstein.

In The Last Decade

Review of Middle East Studies

102 papers receiving 302 citations

Fields of papers published in Review of Middle East Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Middle East Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Middle East Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Middle East Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Middle East Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Middle East Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Middle East Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026