Statistical Methodology

493 papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 493 papers published in Statistical Methodology in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Statistical Methodology usually cover Statistics and Probability (366 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (119 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (117 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (151 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (134 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Statistical Methodology are M. C. Jones, N. Balakrishnan, K. Zografos, Matthijs J. Warrens, Gianfausto Salvadori, Hare Krishna, Ofer Harel, Nicolas Debarsy, Cem Ertur and James P. LeSage.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Statistical Methodology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Statistical Methodology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Statistical Methodology.

Countries where authors publish in Statistical Methodology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Statistical Methodology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Statistical Methodology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistical Methodology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025