Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics

33.2k citations
566 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics

520 papers receiving 32.1k citations

Peers

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Statistics and Probability 2.5k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 4.5k
  • Computational Mathematics 83
  • Analytical Chemistry 1.2k
Replace Computers in Physics with:
Computers in Physics United States
Journal of Classification United States
Bayesian Analysis United States
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
Mathematics of Control Signals and Systems United States
The R Journal United States
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics Australia
Advances in Data Analysis and Classification Italy
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine China
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology United States
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics relative to Computers in Physics United States Computers in Physics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Computers in Physics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics.

About Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics

The 566 papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics in the last decades have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics usually cover Statistics and Probability (273 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (58 papers), Computational Mathematics (4 papers), Artificial Intelligence (207 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (68 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (127 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (125 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (87 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (65 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (40 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (34 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (32 papers) and Data Analysis with R (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics are Hervé Abdi, Lynne J. Williams, Jan de Leeuw, Hadley Wickham, Siuli Mukhopadhyay, André I. Khuri, Aylin Alın, Andrew A. Neath, Joseph E. Cavanaugh and Gary C. McDonald.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact