Bayesian Analysis

25.5k citations
740 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
    • Statistical Methods and Inference
    • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
    • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Papers in

    • Statistical Methods and Inference 309
    • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference 282
    • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models 76
    • Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods 54
    • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications 45
    • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models 299
    • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference 79
    • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 55

Bayesian Analysis

648 papers receiving 21.5k citations

Peers

Bayesian Analysis
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Statistics and Probability 8.4k
  • Atmospheric Science 4.9k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.5k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 1.5k
  • Computational Mathematics 128
Replace Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics with:
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics United States
Computers in Physics United States
The R Journal United States
Journal of Classification United States
Environmental and Ecological Statistics United States
Mathematical Geosciences United States
Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics United States
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics Australia
Test Spain
Handbook of statistics United States
Bayesian Analysis relative to Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics United States Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.0×
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Bayesian Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bayesian Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bayesian Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bayesian Analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Bayesian Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bayesian Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bayesian Analysis.

About Bayesian Analysis

The 740 papers published in Bayesian Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 25.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Bayesian Analysis usually cover Statistics and Probability (489 papers), Artificial Intelligence (405 papers), Computational Mathematics (5 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (72 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (39 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods and Inference (309 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (299 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (282 papers), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (79 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (76 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (55 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (54 papers) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bayesian Analysis are Andrew Gelman, J. Andrés Christen, Maarten Blaauw, John Skilling, James O. Berger, David M. Blei, Michael I. Jordan, Stephen E. Fienberg, Robert B. O’Hara and Mikko J. Sillanpää.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact