This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BJS Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BJS Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BJS Open more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in BJS Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BJS Open.
About BJS Open
The 1.1k papers published in BJS Open in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Papers published in BJS Open usually cover Surgery (414 papers), Oncology (230 papers), Hepatology (48 papers), Emergency Medicine (34 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (80 papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (110 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (78 papers), Hernia repair and management (47 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (45 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (35 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (30 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (29 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BJS Open are Dileep N. Lobo, Martin Rutegård, Peter Matthiessen, Matthew J. Lee, Markku M. Haapamäki, Willem Adrianus Bemelman, Mary Elizabeth Brindle, Gregg Nelson, Phil J. Tozer and Ulf O Gustafsson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.