Cogent Economics & Finance

1.7k papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Accounting (560 papers) and Finance (499 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (292 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (271 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (251 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cogent Economics & Finance are Yaya Keho, Goodness C. Aye, Lamia Jamel, Michael Adusei, Cosimo Magazzino, Nicholas M. Odhiambo, Samuel Kwaku Agyei, Samir Maktouf, Mosab I. Tabash and Quang Nguyen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance.

Countries where authors publish in Cogent Economics & Finance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cogent Economics & Finance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cogent Economics & Finance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cogent Economics & Finance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025