Strategic Organization

546 papers and 23.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 546 papers published in Strategic Organization in the last decades have received a total of 23.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Strategic Organization usually cover Strategy and Management (344 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (212 papers) and Accounting (128 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (234 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (180 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strategic Organization are Guilhem Bascle, Jackson A. Nickerson, Constance E. Helfat, Barton H. Hamilton, Richard Whittington, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Nicolai J. Foss, Margaret A. Peteraf, Paula Jarzabkowski and Teppo Felin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Strategic Organization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Strategic Organization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strategic Organization.

Countries where authors publish in Strategic Organization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strategic Organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strategic Organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strategic Organization more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025