World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

9.0k citations
1.5k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

1.2k papers receiving 7.8k citations

Peers

World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Epidemiology 4.5k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.1k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.3k
  • Surgery 2.9k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 203
Replace Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology with:
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology United Kingdom
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
Disease-a-Month United States
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America United States
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore Singapore
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences Taiwan
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research United States
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management China
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine United States
Archives of cardiovascular diseases France
World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery relative to Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology United Kingdom Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery more than expected).

Fields of papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery.

About World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

The 1.5k papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery usually cover Epidemiology (934 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (591 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (393 papers), Surgery (590 papers) and Emergency Medicine (68 papers) specifically the topics of Congenital Heart Disease Studies (869 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (247 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (220 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (159 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (152 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (151 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (133 papers) and Vascular anomalies and interventions (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery are Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Richard A. Jonas, Constantine Mavroudis, Marshall L. Jacobs, Robert H. Anderson, Carl L. Backer, Joseph A. Dearani, Sara K. Pasquali, David J. Barron and Barbara J. Deal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact