Sexual & Relationship Therapy

946 papers and 12.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 946 papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (504 papers), Social Psychology (330 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (323 papers) specifically the topics of Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (320 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (318 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sexual & Relationship Therapy are Walter Pierre Bouman, Roy J. Levin, Sandra R. Leiblum, Catherine Butler, Bente Træen, Kristen P. Mark, Barry McCarthy, Leonore Tiefer, Meg Barker and Rosemary Basson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Sexual & Relationship Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sexual & Relationship Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sexual & Relationship Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025