Seminars in Nephrology

1.5k papers and 45.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.5k papers published in Seminars in Nephrology in the last decades have received a total of 45.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Seminars in Nephrology usually cover Nephrology (799 papers), Molecular Biology (298 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (287 papers) specifically the topics of Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (257 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (240 papers) and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (235 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Nephrology are Robert Safirstein, István Arany, S. Ananth Karumanchi, Giuseppe D’Amico, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Erwin P. Böttinger, Marina Noris, Nosratola D. Vaziri, Duk‐Hee Kang and Gustavo Blanco.

In The Last Decade

Seminars in Nephrology

1.5k papers receiving 44.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Seminars in Nephrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Nephrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Nephrology.

Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Nephrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Nephrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Nephrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Nephrology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026