Studies in Canadian Literature

473 papers and 450 indexed citations i.

About

The 473 papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature in the last decades have received a total of 450 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (253 papers), Sociology and Political Science (189 papers) and Philosophy (65 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (151 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (118 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Canadian Literature are Richard A. Davis, Marta Caminero‐Santangelo, Faye Hammill, Tony Tremblay, W. R. Martin, Catherine Sheldrick Ross, Guy Beauregard, Danielle Fuller, Daniel Coleman and Dermot McCarthy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Canadian Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Canadian Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Canadian Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Canadian Literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025