Estudios de Asia y África

393 papers and 295 indexed citations i.

About

The 393 papers published in Estudios de Asia y África in the last decades have received a total of 295 indexed citations. Papers published in Estudios de Asia y África usually cover Sociology and Political Science (105 papers), Political Science and International Relations (84 papers) and Anthropology (57 papers) specifically the topics of Hispanic-African Historical Relations (21 papers), International Relations in Latin America (20 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estudios de Asia y África are Saurabh Dube, Marisela Connelly, Hania Zlotnik, María del Pilar Álvarez, Núria Ruiz, David N. Lorenzen, John Marston, Rodolfo Stavenhagen, Miguel León‐Portilla and Pilar España.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Estudios de Asia y África

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Estudios de Asia y África. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estudios de Asia y África.

Countries where authors publish in Estudios de Asia y África

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estudios de Asia y África. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estudios de Asia y África with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estudios de Asia y África more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025