Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History

398 papers and 673 indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History in the last decades have received a total of 673 indexed citations. Papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History usually cover Political Science and International Relations (165 papers), Law (101 papers) and History (79 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Legal Studies and Society (79 papers), Law and Political Science (62 papers) and Classical Studies and Legal History (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History are Nicholas Hd Foster, Martti Koskenniemi, Thomas Duve, Michael Stolleis, Marc Amstutz, Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Lorraine Daston, Tamar Herzog, Miloš Več and Wolfram Brandes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History.

Countries where authors publish in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025