Eric Naiman

681 citations
29 papers · 293 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Eric Naiman

19 papers receiving 118 citations

Peers

Eric Naiman
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Cultural Studies 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 116
  • Space and Planetary Science 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 156
  • Gender Studies 28
Replace Evgeny Dobrenko with:
Evgeny Dobrenko United Kingdom
Helena Gościło United States
Gaines M. Foster United States
Graham Seal Australia
Athena S. Leoussi United Kingdom
Heide Fehrenbach United States
Jean-François Sirinelli France
Jessica Winegar United States
Katerina Clark United States
Karen J. Blair United States
Eric Naiman relative to Evgeny Dobrenko United Kingdom Evgeny Dobrenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Evgeny Dobrenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Naiman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Naiman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Naiman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Naiman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Naiman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Naiman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Naiman. The network helps show where Eric Naiman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Eric Naiman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Naiman Line = papers co-authored together Eric Naiman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Landscape of Stalinism: The Art and Ideology of Soviet Space
200395
2
Everyday life in early Soviet Russia : taking the Revolution inside
200644
3 200129
4 199829
5 199322
6 199420
7 19989
8 19958
9 20167
10 20016
11 19873
12 19983
13
Sex in Public
19973
14 20082
15 19882
16 20012
17 19902
18 20021
19 19911
20 20201

About Eric Naiman

Eric Naiman is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies (7 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (5 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (5 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (5 papers), Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Soviet and Russian History (3 papers) and European history and politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (50 citations), Political Science and International Relations (116 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (156 citations) and Gender Studies (28 citations). Eric Naiman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Evgeny Dobrenko, Christina Kiaer, Sheila Fitzpatrick, Robert W. Chandler and Mary A. Nicholas. Their work appears in journals such as The Slavic and East European Journal, Russian Literature, The Russian Review, Comparative Literature and Canadian Slavonic Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact