Review of International Business and Strategy

4.8k citations
285 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Review of International Business and Strategy

264 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Review of International Business and Strategy
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Strategy and Management 1.6k
  • Business and International Management 59
  • Accounting 623
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 394
  • Information Systems and Management 404
Replace Journal of Asia-Pacific Business with:
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States
European Journal of Management and Business Economics Spain
Journal of Competitiveness Czechia
World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development United States
South Asian Journal of Business Studies India
Journal of Innovation Management Finland
Small Enterprise Research Australia
Management & Marketing Romania
Frontiers of Business Research in China China
Research in the sociology of organizations United Kingdom
Review of International Business and Strategy relative to Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States Journal of Asia-Pacific Business's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Review of International Business and Strategy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of International Business and Strategy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of International Business and Strategy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy.

About Review of International Business and Strategy

The 285 papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Review of International Business and Strategy usually cover Strategy and Management (179 papers), Business and International Management (3 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (31 papers), Accounting (24 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (16 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (147 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (27 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (13 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers), Global trade and economics (8 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (8 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of International Business and Strategy are Dafnis N. Coudounaris, Tatiana Zalan, Ali Tarhini, Suhaiza Ismail, Ra’ed Moh’d Taisir Masa’deh, George Okello Candiya Bongomin, John Chrysostom Kigozi Munene, Joseph Mpeera Ntayi, Ali Abdallah Alalwan and Tiia Vissak.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact