Feminist Theology

416 papers and 669 indexed citations i.

About

The 416 papers published in Feminist Theology in the last decades have received a total of 669 indexed citations. Papers published in Feminist Theology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (231 papers), Religious studies (146 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (55 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Society, and Development (100 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (73 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Feminist Theology are Rosemary Radford Ruether, Lisa Isherwood, Marcella Althaus‐Reid, Carol P. Christ, Adis Duderija, Beth R. Crisp, Mary Grey, Grace M. Jantzen, Elaine Graham and Musa W. Dube.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Feminist Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Feminist Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Feminist Theology.

Countries where authors publish in Feminist Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Feminist Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Feminist Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminist Theology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025