Revue française de pédagogie

1.7k papers and 10.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Revue française de pédagogie in the last decades have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Revue française de pédagogie usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers), Education (681 papers) and Linguistics and Language (344 papers) specifically the topics of Sociology of Public Action and Professional Practices (871 papers), French Language Learning Methods (335 papers) and Educational Practices and Policies (298 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue française de pédagogie are Marie Duru‐Bellat, Pierre Pastré, Marcel Crahay, Raymond Bourdoncle, Gérard Vergnaud, Christian Maroy, Marguerite Altet, Patrick Mayen, Roland Goigoux and Élisabeth Bautier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue française de pédagogie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue française de pédagogie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue française de pédagogie.

Countries where authors publish in Revue française de pédagogie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue française de pédagogie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue française de pédagogie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue française de pédagogie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025