Reviews of Reproduction

235 papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 235 papers published in Reviews of Reproduction in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews of Reproduction usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (77 papers), Reproductive Medicine (73 papers) and Molecular Biology (50 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (69 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (45 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews of Reproduction are Denny Sakkas, DJ Barker, Jonathan L. Tilly, Kevin P. Campbell, T. R. Birkhead, Joséphine Arendt, Iain J. Clarke, Ian Wilmut, Lorraine Young and Kevin D. Sinclair.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews of Reproduction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews of Reproduction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews of Reproduction.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews of Reproduction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews of Reproduction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews of Reproduction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews of Reproduction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025