Berliner Journal für Soziologie

541 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 541 papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie usually cover Sociology and Political Science (363 papers), Political Science and International Relations (186 papers) and General Health Professions (58 papers) specifically the topics of Sociology and Education Studies (122 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (101 papers) and Economic and Social Issues (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Berliner Journal für Soziologie are Ulrich Dolata, Klaus Eder, Ludger Pries, Klaus Dörre, Uwe Schimank, Steffen Mau, Wolfgang Merkel, Jens Beckert, Thomas Faist and Karin Lohr.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie.

Countries where authors publish in Berliner Journal für Soziologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Berliner Journal für Soziologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berliner Journal für Soziologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025