˜The œMissouri review

417 papers and 525 indexed citations

About

The 417 papers published in ˜The œMissouri review in the last decades have received a total of 525 indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œMissouri review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (30 papers), Sociology and Political Science (15 papers) and History (15 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (10 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (9 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (7 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œMissouri review are Suzanne Juhasz, James C. VanderKam, Jamaica Kincaid, Junzi Sun, Admir Barolli, Leonard Barolli, Fatos Xhafa, Linda Hogan, Kangbin Yim and Fang−Yie Leu.

In The Last Decade

˜The œMissouri review

39 papers receiving 113 citations

Fields of papers published in ˜The œMissouri review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œMissouri review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œMissouri review.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œMissouri review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œMissouri review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œMissouri review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œMissouri review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026