Journal of Banking Regulation

497 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 497 papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation usually cover Finance (365 papers), Accounting (175 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (149 papers) specifically the topics of Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (303 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (88 papers) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Banking Regulation are Christophe J. Godlewski, Imad A. Moosa, Rifaat Ahmed Abdel Karim, Dalvinder Singh, Andrew Campbell, Kern Alexander, María J. Nieto, Simon Archer, Rosa M. Lastra and Philip Linsley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Banking Regulation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Banking Regulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Banking Regulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Banking Regulation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025