Regions & Cohesion

208 papers and 612 indexed citations

About

The 208 papers published in Regions & Cohesion in the last decades have received a total of 612 indexed citations. Papers published in Regions & Cohesion usually cover Sociology and Political Science (82 papers), Political Science and International Relations (71 papers) and Development (23 papers) specifically the topics of Migration and Labor Dynamics (14 papers), Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (13 papers) and International Development and Aid (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regions & Cohesion are Harlan Koff, Stephen P. Mumme, Emma Carmel, Regine Paul, Carmen Maganda, Edith Kauffer, Suzanne Graham, Katja Hujo, Kate A. Berry and Octavio Pérez-Maqueo.

In The Last Decade

Regions & Cohesion

154 papers receiving 521 citations

Fields of papers published in Regions & Cohesion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regions & Cohesion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regions & Cohesion.

Countries where authors publish in Regions & Cohesion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regions & Cohesion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regions & Cohesion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regions & Cohesion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026