Records Management Journal

518 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 518 papers published in Records Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Records Management Journal usually cover Conservation (293 papers), Information Systems (106 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (85 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (288 papers), Data Quality and Management (67 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Records Management Journal are Victoria L. Lemieux, Julie McLeod, Elizabeth Lomas, Jóhanna Gunnlaugsdóttir, Brendan E. Asogwa, Frank Upward, Carl W. Newton, Sue Childs, Elizabeth Shepherd and Justus Wamukoya.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Records Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Records Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Records Management Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Records Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Records Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Records Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Records Management Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025