Rhetoric and Public Affairs

822 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 822 papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs usually cover Philosophy (419 papers), Sociology and Political Science (217 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (196 papers) specifically the topics of Rhetoric and Communication Studies (395 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (96 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rhetoric and Public Affairs are Josue David Cisneros, Leah Ceccarelli, Robert L. Ivie, John Murphy, Cara A. Finnegan, Robert Asen, David Frank, Karlyn Kohrs Campbell, Kevin Michael DeLuca and Robert C. Rowland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs.

Countries where authors publish in Rhetoric and Public Affairs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rhetoric and Public Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhetoric and Public Affairs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025