Quaderni costituzionali

401 papers and 276 indexed citations i.

About

The 401 papers published in Quaderni costituzionali in the last decades have received a total of 276 indexed citations. Papers published in Quaderni costituzionali usually cover Sociology and Political Science (193 papers), Political Science and International Relations (185 papers) and Industrial relations (182 papers) specifically the topics of Legal and Labor Studies (182 papers), Human Rights and Immigration (139 papers) and European and International Law Studies (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaderni costituzionali are Sabino Cassese, Giuliano Amato, Francesco Clementi, Giuseppe Ugo Rescigno, Marco Goldoni, Maurizio Cotta, Paolo Veronesi, Gábor Halmai, Gianfranco Pasquino and Joseph H. H. Weiler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quaderni costituzionali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaderni costituzionali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaderni costituzionali.

Countries where authors publish in Quaderni costituzionali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaderni costituzionali. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaderni costituzionali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaderni costituzionali more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025