OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii

543 papers and 173 indexed citations i.

About

The 543 papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii in the last decades have received a total of 173 indexed citations. Papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii usually cover Political Science and International Relations (152 papers), Sociology and Political Science (119 papers) and Demography (57 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (55 papers), Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation (36 papers) and Global Political and Economic Relations (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii are Jie Ding, Chenyu Wang, David Brandenberger, Tanel Kerikmäe, David Ramiro Troitiño, Li Ming, Dandan Chen, Sergey Kulik, Liying Liu and Jie Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii.

Countries where authors publish in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025