Psychologica Belgica

625 papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 625 papers published in Psychologica Belgica in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychologica Belgica usually cover Social Psychology (158 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (155 papers) and Clinical Psychology (147 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (45 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (44 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychologica Belgica are Marc Brysbaert, Raymond Bruyer, Guido Peeters, Jan De Houwer, Dirk Hermans, Rudi De Raedt, Michel Hansenne, Ivan Mervielde, Thomas S. Redick and Randall W. Engle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychologica Belgica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychologica Belgica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychologica Belgica.

Countries where authors publish in Psychologica Belgica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychologica Belgica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychologica Belgica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychologica Belgica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025