MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

785 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 785 papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY usually cover Surgery (661 papers), Epidemiology (269 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (125 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (284 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (191 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (159 papers). The most active scholars publishing in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY are Giuseppe Porcellini, Alessandro Castagna, Giovanni Merolla, Vincenzo Denaro, Paolo Paladini, Raffaele Garofalo, Stefano Petrillo, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Marco Conti and Roberto Rotini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

Countries where authors publish in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025