Psychiatrische Praxis

1.6k papers and 9.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), General Health Professions (700 papers) and Social Psychology (368 papers) specifically the topics of Psychiatric care and mental health services (801 papers), Health and Medical Studies (491 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychiatrische Praxis are Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Matthias C. Angermeyer, Tilman Steinert, H. Katschnig, Norman Sartorius, Hugh L. Freeman, Dirk Richter, Reinhold Kilian, Herbert Matschinger and Janine Stein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis.

Countries where authors publish in Psychiatrische Praxis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychiatrische Praxis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychiatrische Praxis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychiatrische Praxis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025