Progress in Transplantation

1.6k papers and 16.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Progress in Transplantation in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Transplantation usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (788 papers), Surgery (668 papers) and Transplantation (444 papers) specifically the topics of Organ Donation and Transplantation (654 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (448 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (369 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Transplantation are Cynthia L. Russell, David J. Powner, James R. Rodrigue, Amy D. Waterman, Laura A. Siminoff, Dianne LaPointe Rudow, Barry A. Hong, Elisa J. Gordon, Thomas Hugh Feeley and Michael A. DeVita.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Transplantation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Transplantation.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Transplantation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Transplantation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025