Progress in Quantum Electronics

367 papers and 24.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics in the last decades have received a total of 24.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (244 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (203 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (54 papers) specifically the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (61 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (60 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Quantum Electronics are Antoni Rogalski, John H. Marburger, Anthony J. Kenyon, Lee Tutt, Thomas F. Boggess, R. W. Hellwarth, Richard Scheps, Thomas F. Krauss, Valentin Petrov and Helen M. Pask.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Quantum Electronics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Quantum Electronics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Quantum Electronics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Quantum Electronics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025