Progress in Aerospace Sciences

About

The 888 papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 72.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences usually cover Aerospace Engineering (540 papers), Computational Mechanics (437 papers) and Applied Mathematics (100 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (266 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (254 papers) and Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Aerospace Sciences are Constantinos Soutis, Wei Shyy, Alexander I. J. Forrester, Andy J. Keane, Ugo Piomelli, John C. Lin, Jean Délery, Jens Nørkær Sørensen, A. Michalke and James T. Staley.

In The Last Decade

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

852 papers receiving 68.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Aerospace Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026