International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking

2.0k citations
516 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking

408 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Management Information Systems 685
  • Strategy and Management 699
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 325
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 40
  • Marketing 237
Replace International Journal for Quality Research with:
International Journal for Quality Research Russia
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Serbia
International Journal of Business and Systems Research India
International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology India
Industrial Engineering & Management Systems South Korea
International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences India
Management Systems in Production Engineering Poland
Applied System Innovation China
Engineering Management United Kingdom
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management United States
International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking relative to International Journal for Quality Research Russia International Journal for Quality Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
International Journal for Quality Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking.

About International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking

The 516 papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking usually cover Management Information Systems (170 papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (95 papers), Strategy and Management (121 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (40 papers) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Supply Management (102 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (38 papers), Quality and Management Systems (33 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (30 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (29 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (24 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (22 papers) and Advanced machining processes and optimization (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking are Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, Michael Sony, Nandakumar Mekoth, Andrea Chiarini, Aasha Jayant Sharma, Sekar Vinodh, Samuel Rajkumar Devadasan, Tilak Raj, R. Gandhinathan and Saurav Datta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact