Countries where authors publish in Public Relations Inquiry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Relations Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Relations Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Relations Inquiry more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Public Relations Inquiry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Relations Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Relations Inquiry.
About Public Relations Inquiry
The 239 papers published in Public Relations Inquiry in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Public Relations Inquiry usually cover Communication (203 papers), Philosophy (59 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36 papers), Gender Studies (28 papers) and Strategy and Management (42 papers) specifically the topics of Public Relations and Crisis Communication (183 papers), Media Studies and Communication (86 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (58 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (43 papers), Social Media and Politics (34 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (29 papers), Corporate Identity and Reputation (25 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Relations Inquiry are Lee Edwards, Jim Macnamara, Juliet Roper, Catherine Archer, Stefan Wehmeier, Melissa Graham, Candace L. White, Line Schmeltz, Øyvind Ihlen and Kate Fitch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.