Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

381 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 381 papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (305 papers), Molecular Biology (42 papers) and Surgery (35 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (190 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (141 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review are Federico Lombardi, S. Serge Barold, Akihiko Nogami, Morrison Hodges, Marek Malík, Phyllis K. Stein, Josef Kautzner, Edward P. Walsh, Arthur J. Moss and K. Seidl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiac Electrophysiology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiac Electrophysiology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025