KONA Powder and Particle Journal

684 papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 684 papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal usually cover Computational Mechanics (223 papers), Mechanical Engineering (222 papers) and Materials Chemistry (156 papers) specifically the topics of Granular flow and fluidized beds (181 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (100 papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in KONA Powder and Particle Journal are R. Hogg, Luís Marcelo Tavares, E. Hugh Stitt, Michele Marigo, Michael J. Hounslow, D.W. Fuerstenau, Colin Thornton, Mikio Sakai, Eiji Iritani and Lutz Mädler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal.

Countries where authors publish in KONA Powder and Particle Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in KONA Powder and Particle Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KONA Powder and Particle Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025