Portugaliae Mathematica

510 papers and 3.2k indexed citations

About

The 510 papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica usually cover Applied Mathematics (177 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 papers) and Mathematical Physics (142 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (52 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (37 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Portugaliae Mathematica are Alain Haraux, J. L. Lions, David J. Foulis, Stéphane Jaffard, Florian Luca, Hans Samelson, Bayram Şahin, Lucio Boccardo, Paulo Ribenboim and François Murat.

In The Last Decade

Portugaliae Mathematica

372 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica.

Countries where authors publish in Portugaliae Mathematica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Portugaliae Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Portugaliae Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Portugaliae Mathematica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026